A deal score you can actually check.
Open any Synq Score and you see what it looked at and what it concluded from each piece. The same evidence always gives the same number — so it says the same thing in front of your board three months later.
A Synq Score is a single number for how a deal is really doing, built from what actually happened on it — emails, meetings, stage moves, tickets. It is arithmetic, not a hunch: the same evidence always gives the same score, and one click shows you every piece of evidence it used to get there.
Why is it so hard to say which deals are real?
Because the number you have was typed in by the person with the most to lose from it being low. You shouldn’t have to run your quarter on that. Every leader knows the feeling of walking into a forecast call already suspecting that a third of the committed number is optimism, and having no way to say which third without accusing someone.
So the deal that was 80% for two quarters slips in the last week, the board asks what happened, and the honest answer — we believed the field — is not one you can give twice. The Synq Score replaces that guess with something you can point at.
How do I get a score I can use?
In three steps, and the first one takes ten minutes. AI never decides the number. It writes the sentence explaining it, and only after the arithmetic is done.
- 1
Connect your pipeline, read-only
HubSpot in a few minutes, or upload an export if you would rather not connect anything yet. Your open deals come back scored the same day.
- 2
Read the shortlist, not the dashboard
Slipping deals come first, each with the reason attached. Five minutes before a pipeline review tells you which three deals the hour should be spent on.
- 3
Check anything you plan to repeat
Before you say a number out loud, open it. You see the evidence it used and what it concluded from each piece — enough to argue with, or to stand behind.
Can I trust this number?
Not on our say-so — check it. Open a score and you see the evidence it used, the rules it applied, and what it concluded from each piece, laid out the way you would walk through a spreadsheet with someone who doubts it. Pull the same score up three months later, in front of your board, and it says the same thing. If the evidence behind it stops holding up, the score comes down rather than sitting on your dashboard quietly going stale.
That is what changes the room. The pipeline review stops being a contest of convictions, because everyone is arguing from the same evidence — and when your CFO asks why a deal moved, you open it rather than reconstruct it from memory.
This covers the Synq Score and the risk signals behind it — the numbers you would be asked to defend. Early warnings are a heads-up rather than a verdict, and are not checked the same way.
What happens when the evidence is not good enough?
You get told, rather than reassured. A deal with too little behind it comes back saying so, with the missing piece named, instead of a middle value that looks on screen exactly like a real reading. And SalesSynq keeps a running list of everything it will not answer yet, and why — on the screen, where you can read it.
That is the part worth having when it matters. A number that disappears when its evidence fails is a number you can repeat in front of a board, because it has never quietly held a position it could not back up.
We describe this in words rather than as a percentage on purpose. A tool that answers less often is not automatically a better one, and quoting that figure would invite you to reward the wrong thing.
Questions about the Synq Score
Score your own pipeline, then try to break it
The fastest way to judge a score you can check is to open one and argue with it. Bring a deal you already have an opinion about.
Private beta is invite-only and requires approval. General availability targeted for Q3 2026.
Last updated . We refresh beta status, availability dates and integration status on a monthly sweep.

