We use cookies to improve your experience and analyse site traffic. By clicking "Accept", you consent to our use of analytics cookies. Privacy Policy

SalesSynq Logo
HomeWho we serveWhat we doPricingSecurityPrivacyTalk to usMore
HomeWho we serveWhat we doPricingSecurityPrivacyTalk to us
Financial services & regulated

Revenue AI that survives your risk committee.

Scoring done in plain code rather than a model nobody can question, AI that stays off until switched on per workflow, and an audit trail the application cannot rewrite.

Yes, if your second line can read exactly what it does. SalesSynq spots at-risk deals early and tells your team exactly what to do next. It decides by rules rather than a language model, keeps AI off until you switch it on workflow by workflow, and records every consequential change permanently.

Read the Trust CenterBook the 90-second demo

What is a quiet client relationship costing you right now?

In a regulated firm, deals go quiet the same way they do anywhere else. The sponsor moves teams. The mandate slides to next year. The renewal that funds your number stops being discussed and nobody says so. The difference is that you cannot simply buy a tool to see it — anything that touches client data and says the word AI goes to a committee first.

So you end up choosing between a pipeline you can actually see and a purchase your risk committee will pass. You should not have to choose. And you should not have to find out in the QBR that the relationship went quiet in February, while the tool that would have shown you sat in review for two quarters.

How does a regulated firm actually get started?

In an order that puts the hardest gate first. Most vendors put the reviewer last and discover the objection in week six; this one hands them the file before you spend a meeting on it.

  1. 1

    Send your reviewer the control map first

    Before the demo, before the NDA. What the system does, what it refuses to do, and which of those limits are built into the product is published on a page your risk, compliance or data-protection reviewer can read without talking to anyone.

  2. 2

    Connect one team, read-only

    Your CRM connects read-only and nothing in it changes. AI stays off entirely until you switch it on, one workflow at a time, so compliance can approve exactly the lane it has reviewed and leave the rest dark.

  3. 3

    See what is at risk, and act on it

    The relationships that have gone quiet, the deals with nothing behind the stage, the renewals worth a call this month — with a person approving anything consequential before it goes anywhere.

What that buys you is a normal revenue operation inside an abnormal control environment. Your pipeline reviews get calm and specific. Your second line has a document instead of a demo they were not invited to. And when someone at board level asks why a mandate slipped, you can show what was known, when, and what your team did about it.

What does your risk committee actually need to see?

Four things, and they are the same four in every regulated firm we have spoken to. Not a demo — a legible answer to what makes the decision, who turned the AI on, what the system is structurally forbidden from inferring, and what record exists afterwards. Most revenue tools answer these with policy documents. These answers are built into the product, which is a different kind of promise.

  • Show me what makes the decision

    Rules, not a language model. The same evidence always produces the same score, and that is held in place by tests that break the build if it ever stops being true. AI writes the sentence that explains a score; it never picks the number.

  • Show me who turned the AI on

    You did, one workflow at a time, and you can turn it off again. There is no single account-level switch that lights everything up, and the explanation the AI writes is tied to the exact decision it describes, so it cannot drift away from the result it claims to explain.

  • Show me what it is forbidden to infer

    Emotion, sentiment and personality about people. The product cannot store that kind of judgement at all — it is blocked at the point where data would be written, not promised in a policy document that a future release could quietly outgrow.

  • Show me the record

    Every consequential change is written to a customer record that cannot be edited or deleted. When your reviewer asks what the system decided on 14 March and on what basis, that is a question with an answer that does not depend on somebody remembering it.

Seeing exactly what the system looked at proves what it saw and what it decided. It does not prove business impact, and we do not present it as evidence of one.

Can it be turned on our own people?

No — and this is the question your works council, your HR director and your reps will all ask in different words. SalesSynq scores deals and teams. It has no concept of a scorecard for a named person, so there is nothing for a future manager to quietly enable when the quarter goes badly.

  • No scorecard for a named individual. It is not switched off in your configuration — the ability is not there to switch on.
  • Aggregate reporting suppresses groups below five by default and can be configured no lower than two; individual scorecards and rankings remain prohibited.
  • Nothing in the product routes a decision to a named person as a performance action, so it cannot be turned into a performance-management instrument.
  • You can raise the bar we hold ourselves to. Nobody can lower it — not your administrator, and not us on your behalf.

Which means you can tell your team what this is for, and it will still be true after the next release.

Who turns the AI on, and can we turn it off?

You do, one workflow at a time, and yes. Everything AI-related is off when you arrive. Your compliance function approves exactly the lane it has reviewed and leaves the rest dark, and it can withdraw that later without a support ticket or a renegotiation. The figures quoted in anything the AI writes come from the system rather than the model, so an explanation cannot invent a source.

SalesSynq drafts and proposes; it does not act on your pipeline by itself, and it does not change your CRM records. Routing a task into a work tool is a separate, opt-in permission granted per tool, and it is refused until you grant it. Any claim that it acts on your behalf would be wrong.

What will you not claim to us?

These, said first rather than under questioning. In your sector a vendor who only discloses under pressure has told you how it will behave during an incident, and that is the more expensive risk.

  • We do not hold, and will not imply, a security certification we have not earned. Ask where we stand and you get the current answer in writing.
  • We make no compliance claim under the EU AI Act, and you should be sceptical of any vendor who does. What we publish instead is what the system does and refuses to do.
  • We publish no SalesSynq performance statistic and no claim about beating anyone else. Generated certification fixtures are not predictive evidence.
  • If a number on a screen came from sample data rather than yours, we tell you at the time.
  • It never acts on its own. SalesSynq proposes; a person approves anything consequential.

Can our reviewer assess this before we book a call?

Yes, and that is the fastest route to an answer either way. The control map is published on a page that needs no login, no NDA and no sales conversation — because in regulated firms the person who can stop the purchase usually never gets a demo. Send it to them today, and you will know within a week whether this clears, instead of finding out in week six.

If it clears, what you get on the other side is the thing you actually wanted: knowing which client relationships are going quiet while there is still time to pick up the phone.

Trust Center →For compliance & IT →AI governance in practice →

Questions from risk, compliance and second-line reviewers

Yes, provided the system is legible to a second line of defence. The questions that decide it are always the same: what makes the decision, who turned the AI on, what is it forbidden to infer, and what record survives afterwards. SalesSynq answers those with rule-based scoring, consent granted one workflow at a time, a block on judging people that is built into the product, and a customer record that cannot be edited or deleted.

No. Every score is computed by rules from the evidence in front of them, and the same evidence always produces the same result. AI writes the sentence that explains the score, and that explanation is tied to the exact decision it describes — so an explanation cannot drift away from the result it claims to explain.

It does not store or use model-derived mood, sentiment, tone or personality fields; database constraints reject them. There is no scorecard for a named individual to enable. Aggregate reporting suppresses groups below five by default and can be configured no lower than two; that bounded setting cannot enable individual monitoring.

On a preliminary classification, published with the control map behind it. We make no compliance claim under it, no regulator or auditor has assessed it, and you should be sceptical of any vendor who tells you otherwise. Your reviewer can read the whole thing before the first call and will get an updated version when ours changes.

Nothing is published. Where the inputs behind a judgement are missing or stale, SalesSynq tells you it does not know rather than showing a neutral-looking number. What it will not score yet, and why, is a list your reviewer can read in the product — not a disclaimer at the bottom of a page.

Get the quarter back, and clear the committee

Send your second line the control map today. Then bring one team's pipeline and see what has been going quiet.

Join the private betaRead the Trust Center

Private beta is invite-only and requires approval. General availability targeted for Q3 2026.

Last updated 1 August 2026. We refresh beta status, availability dates and integration status on a monthly sweep.

SalesSynq

SalesSynq is a revenue intelligence layer for B2B teams. We help you see pipeline and revenue reality without replacing your CRM.

Product

  • Overview
  • Synq Score
  • Evidence Radar
  • Committee Radar
  • Forecasting
  • Workspaces
  • Integrations
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • All solutions
  • RevOps
  • Sales leaders
  • Sales managers
  • Customer success
  • Delivery leaders
  • Founders
  • Compliance & IT
  • Small business
  • Mid-market

Industries & regions

  • All industries
  • SaaS
  • Financial services
  • Professional services
  • All regions
  • UAE & GCC
  • Europe
  • United States
  • India
  • Singapore

Use cases & comparisons

  • All use cases
  • Pipeline reviews
  • Forecast defense
  • Committee engagement
  • AI governance
  • Compare tools
  • vs Gong
  • vs Clari
  • vs People.ai
  • vs Salesforce Einstein

Resources

  • Resource hub
  • Glossary
  • Blog
  • How-to guides
  • Case studies
  • FAQ
  • Pipeline audit
  • GTM leakage assessment

Company

  • About
  • Trust Center
  • AI disclosure
  • Request beta access
  • Book a demo
  • Talk to us
  • Legal
© 2026 SalesSynq. All rights reserved.
SecurityPrivacyTermsDPAAI ActSub-processorsStatusContact SalesSynq
Find your fit:
I'm a